<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft ignores the lesson and keeps being simply rude</title>
	<atom:link href="http://diary.braniecki.net/2007/12/10/microsoft-ignores-the-lesson-and-keeps-being-simply-rude/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://diary.braniecki.net/2007/12/10/microsoft-ignores-the-lesson-and-keeps-being-simply-rude/</link>
	<description>Open-source development violates almost all known management theories.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:43:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: quick</title>
		<link>http://diary.braniecki.net/2007/12/10/microsoft-ignores-the-lesson-and-keeps-being-simply-rude/comment-page-1/#comment-4069</link>
		<dc:creator>quick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diary.braniecki.net/2007/12/10/microsoft-ignores-the-lesson-and-keeps-being-simply-rude/#comment-4069</guid>
		<description>To na pewno bardzo ciekawe co tu piszesz, ale dlaczego feed znajduje się na POLSKIEJ Planecie Mozilli, jak polski to tu jest jedynie autor. Halo ... anglojęzyczna planeta też jest (jest prawda?) to może lepiej tam?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To na pewno bardzo ciekawe co tu piszesz, ale dlaczego feed znajduje się na POLSKIEJ Planecie Mozilli, jak polski to tu jest jedynie autor. Halo &#8230; anglojęzyczna planeta też jest (jest prawda?) to może lepiej tam?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MusK</title>
		<link>http://diary.braniecki.net/2007/12/10/microsoft-ignores-the-lesson-and-keeps-being-simply-rude/comment-page-1/#comment-3999</link>
		<dc:creator>MusK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diary.braniecki.net/2007/12/10/microsoft-ignores-the-lesson-and-keeps-being-simply-rude/#comment-3999</guid>
		<description>&gt;&quot;I believe that the reason Microsoft is not working with us, is mixture of ignorance for &gt;other market players, lack of visible benefit for them, and lack of understanding for &gt;changes that happened in last years on the IT market.&quot;

I can see here some misconception… You really think Microsoft is ignoring someone or don’t understand the changes on the market?

Short example – a year ago I read a book by William H. Gates III “Business &amp; the Speed of Thought”. Like every business achievers’ book, it’s dull as ditchwater. The point is about its content. Few of its chapters are about Business Intelligence software. Of course it’s about Microsoft BI software and how brilliant it is. Since last year (or even 2005) Microsoft is pushing hard its Business Intelligence software. Moreover is the book was published in 1999.

Can you see the concurrence here? Yes, he and his workmates were, are and will be prepared for the future [i.e. changes in the market]. That’s at least the big picture.

If they’re truly blowing off Internet Explorer (and personally I don’t believe in that) there must be a reason for that. If they want to have a secret - there must be a reason for that. If they’re just delaying it - there must be a reason for that also. The point is – there MUST be some reason. What’s that reason? Don’t know, but at the end of the day, everyone has a goal. 

Do you really think a 79,000-employees company doesn’t know what to do with one of their most important products? You (like MS) know very well browser isn’t just for web (or the other way;-) browsing.

As it goes with the proverb - wise men don&#039;t make the same mistake twice. Well, they aren’t stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&#8221;I believe that the reason Microsoft is not working with us, is mixture of ignorance for &gt;other market players, lack of visible benefit for them, and lack of understanding for &gt;changes that happened in last years on the IT market.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can see here some misconception… You really think Microsoft is ignoring someone or don’t understand the changes on the market?</p>
<p>Short example – a year ago I read a book by William H. Gates III “Business &amp; the Speed of Thought”. Like every business achievers’ book, it’s dull as ditchwater. The point is about its content. Few of its chapters are about Business Intelligence software. Of course it’s about Microsoft BI software and how brilliant it is. Since last year (or even 2005) Microsoft is pushing hard its Business Intelligence software. Moreover is the book was published in 1999.</p>
<p>Can you see the concurrence here? Yes, he and his workmates were, are and will be prepared for the future [i.e. changes in the market]. That’s at least the big picture.</p>
<p>If they’re truly blowing off Internet Explorer (and personally I don’t believe in that) there must be a reason for that. If they want to have a secret &#8211; there must be a reason for that. If they’re just delaying it &#8211; there must be a reason for that also. The point is – there MUST be some reason. What’s that reason? Don’t know, but at the end of the day, everyone has a goal. </p>
<p>Do you really think a 79,000-employees company doesn’t know what to do with one of their most important products? You (like MS) know very well browser isn’t just for web (or the other way;-) browsing.</p>
<p>As it goes with the proverb &#8211; wise men don&#8217;t make the same mistake twice. Well, they aren’t stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

