Comments on: The new era of software localization is approaching http://diary.braniecki.net/2009/12/17/the-new-era-of-software-localization-is-approaching/ Open-source development violates almost all known management theories. Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:43:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: zbraniecki http://diary.braniecki.net/2009/12/17/the-new-era-of-software-localization-is-approaching/comment-page-1/#comment-48157 zbraniecki Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:45:07 +0000 http://diary.braniecki.net/?p=1032#comment-48157 Jeremy just showed me first mockups with XUL ContentSink working with L20n. My approach (there's a xulrunner app in my repo) is a JS way to work with it. For PHP I have some early lib elements in the repo as well. Jeremy just showed me first mockups with XUL ContentSink working with L20n. My approach (there’s a xulrunner app in my repo) is a JS way to work with it.

For PHP I have some early lib elements in the repo as well.

]]> By: Robert Kaiser http://diary.braniecki.net/2009/12/17/the-new-era-of-software-localization-is-approaching/comment-page-1/#comment-48125 Robert Kaiser Sun, 20 Dec 2009 02:13:33 +0000 http://diary.braniecki.net/?p=1032#comment-48125 YAY!!!!! Guess what I just cloned ;-) Do we have some docs on how to use those things? Is something of the code ready for testing use already? I'd be mostly interested in the PHP stuff for now, actually - or maybe JS if there's an in-Mozilla-chrome way of using it... YAY!!!!!

Guess what I just cloned ;-)
Do we have some docs on how to use those things? Is something of the code ready for testing use already? I’d be mostly interested in the PHP stuff for now, actually – or maybe JS if there’s an in-Mozilla-chrome way of using it…

]]> By: MarkC http://diary.braniecki.net/2009/12/17/the-new-era-of-software-localization-is-approaching/comment-page-1/#comment-48034 MarkC Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:04:25 +0000 http://diary.braniecki.net/?p=1032#comment-48034 Looks interesting. Hopefully this won't leave remote-XUL out in the cold like the current DTD-based approach does. We have to inline our DTD file on the server side for every page request on our remote-XUL app because of bug #22942, adding hugely to the download size, so any system that lets us easily avoid that would be a godsend. Looks interesting. Hopefully this won’t leave remote-XUL out in the cold like the current DTD-based approach does. We have to inline our DTD file on the server side for every page request on our remote-XUL app because of bug #22942, adding hugely to the download size, so any system that lets us easily avoid that would be a godsend.

]]>